4 ms·
The recent Carpenter decision means that cellphone data held by a third party still needs a warrant to seize. The USG argues that since the same data is alread
by roywiggins 6y ago
The recent Carpenter decision means that cellphone data held by a third party still needs a warrant to seize.
The USG argues that since the same data is already being sold commercially, they can buy it on the open market without a warrant.
- emkemp 6y agoFor the curious, the SCOTUS opinion on Carpenter v United States is here (PDF warning): https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/17pdf/16-402_h315.pdf https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/17pdf/16-402_h315.pdf