> Why not just do labor, middle management, owners like in the first part of the piece? I think the idea is that the communication styles from the first part c

> Why not just do labor, middle management, owners like in the first part of the piece? I think the idea is that the communication styles from the first part carry over to the second. Which means that if you're an university-educated professional or a cultural leader, you mostly communicate through baby-talk and posture-talk. At least that seems to be the author's point, I'm not sure to what extent I agree.