I had to go back and re-read the article because I thought I had missed something. The whole content seems to consist of only three points: 1- that their senso

I had to go back and re-read the article because I thought I had missed something. The whole content seems to consist of only three points: 1- that their sensors are better and lidar is indispensable. 2- that there is no continuum between assisted driving and fsd. 3- that they have already achieved full self driving. That's it. Neither 1 or 2 are supported by any argument, and 3 contradicts the widespread opinion here that fsd is impossible (at least without agi). Note: I'm not defending Tesla, I'm just saying that this article is very light on actual content.