The main issue with this is there doesn't appear to be a definition of "geek" (aside from that Venn diagram). It's entirely based of respondent connotation of "

The main issue with this is there doesn't appear to be a definition of "geek" (aside from that Venn diagram). It's entirely based of respondent connotation of "geek". In fact, the "Changing Definition of Geek" section makes this abundantly clear. It asks NOTHING about what the definition is. What it does ask is if it's positive/negative to be a geek and if it's a more common phenomena to be a geek now than in the past. I think it would be better phrased: "Changing Connotation of Geek".