4 ms·
I don't understand why they chose to present these parts as .jpg. Why go through the effort of creating a 10B pixels masterpiece, when you compress it with a lo
by hetspookjee 6y ago
I don't understand why they chose to present these parts as .jpg. Why go through the effort of creating a 10B pixels masterpiece, when you compress it with a lossy format like jpg. Or am I missing something?
Also here's a working link for anyone to lazy to insert the numbers: https://www.micro-pano.com/pearl/panos/STITCH_-_FULL_35x.tiles/l8/001/l8_001_010.jpg https://www.micro-pano.com/pearl/panos/STITCH_-_FULL_35x.til...
- dagw 6y agoI don't understand why they chose to present these parts as .jpg I suspect that this page is primarily for getting publicity and 'buzz'. If you want the data for actual research I'm sure they have it in much better formats.
- zamadatix 6y ago"Why go through the effort of creating a 10B pixels masterpiece, when you compress it with a lossy format like jpg. Or am I missing something?" Remember you're looking at tilesets for the web browser viewer on a public site, not a copy of the raw data for research purposes.
- deleted 6y ago[deleted]