2 ms·
With that decay rate, the difference between exponential and linear decay is going to be tough to pick out just by looking at the graph. http://www.wolframalph
by minimax 15y ago
With that decay rate, the difference between exponential and linear decay is going to be tough to pick out just by looking at the graph.
http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=plot+e^%28x*ln%28.75%29%2F7%29%2C+1-x*.25%2F7+from+x%3D0+to+10 http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=plot+e^%28x*ln%28.75%29...
edit: fixed decay constant
- fhars 15y agoYes, indeed. That is a nice graph, and in absence of a mechanism that would explain why no link can last longer than 28 years it should quite convincingly show that linear decay has not been established.