> What is under dispute are the methods used to determine who that was. What's the dispute, though? Use of cell records to filter suspects has a long history.

> What is under dispute are the methods used to determine who that was. What's the dispute, though? Use of cell records to filter suspects has a long history. And here we have a situation (an assault on a single building) that is almost perfectly suited to exactly this technique. > The particular method outlined in the article implicates a number of completely innocent protestors. Again, I see little evidence for an organized protest outside the capitol. Virtually everyone walked across that barrier. And given that, yeah, I think it's reasonable to assume that people in the capitol building cell viscinity without an existing alibi are suspects.