4 ms·
Are you being purposefully misleading? People moved in and then the race track tried to get noise restrictions from the 1950s changed to benefit them.(increasi
by randompwd 6y ago
Are you being purposefully misleading?
People moved in and then the race track tried to get noise restrictions from the 1950s changed to benefit them.(increasing no-muffler days(wtf?) and opening race course on sunday)
From your linked propaganda piece:
> restrictions on use set in the 1950s.
I'd be heavily on side of people wanting a peaceful place to live than to cater to ignorant arseholes who don't want to use mufflers cos they like the sound it makes.
- s1artibartfast 6y agoUnfortunately, this often a necessity strategy in the US legal system, where you have to exercise your rights to maintain them. This could’ve been advised directly from their legal team. If you build a raceway with the expectation of being able to scale usage based on demand and need,End it appears that this is coming into jeopardy, they need to scale up sooner to establish president as more people move in. There is a similar problem with farm water usage where farmers are incentivized to waste water due to a use it or lose it legal situation
- JJMcJ 6y agoBig difference between race tracks, which are entertainment, and farming, which is where our food comes from.
- recursive 6y agoIf your definition of a peaceful place to live includes not hearing a race track, I can think of a few better strategies than moving in next to a race track.