3 ms·
In other words, full time job type time consumption (from one of your probably four or five classes) doesn't qualify for call-by-name status. Yowza. Great post
by _pius 15y ago
In other words, full time job type time consumption (from one of your probably four or five classes) doesn't qualify for call-by-name status. Yowza.
Great post, though I wonder if the call-by-name phenomenon is more about notoriety than actual difficulty. For instance, the only other call-by-name class I can think of is "Orgo" (5.12, Organic Chemistry), which people thought was hard but not comparable to Unified, Junior Lab, or ICE.
There's also the secondary tier of fame, classes whose numbers you can say to nearly anyone without mentioning the course. Notable examples include:
* The "Double-oh's" (6.001, 6.002, 6.003, and 6.004, the four intro Course 6 classes plus 2.007, the Course 2 intro to Design and Manufacturing)
* 170 (6.170 - Software Engineering Lab)
* 100B (18.100B - Analysis, the "more demanding" version "for students with more mathematical maturity")
- madcaptenor 15y agoI don't remember anyone calling 5.12 "Orgo". Also, for 100B, I think it has something to do with there being a letter after the name. Without checking, I'm willing to guess that there are other courses at MIT numbered X.100 but not any numbered X.100B. But on the first day of 18.100B, I distinctly remember the professor saying: "some of you are freshmen. this course is too hard for freshmen. it's also too hard for sophomores, juniors, seniors, and maybe some grad students."