I vouched for this, because labeling the Podesta emails as 'literally nothing incriminating' may be literally true, it is obviously an attempt at whitewashing t

I vouched for this, because labeling the Podesta emails as 'literally nothing incriminating' may be literally true, it is obviously an attempt at whitewashing the damning information that was revealed, the Sanders debacle but one of many. [0] So the gist of the parent comment, and implicit criticism that the article is a one-sided DNC piece, is relevant IMO. Which detracts some but not completely from the fact that the article paints a coherent and highly relevant picture of the lengths that Trump-supporters (domestic and foreign alike) were willing to go at the expense of vulnerable people in order to secure power for Trump. [0] https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-37639370 https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-37639370