3 ms·

> Definitely not, the UN has no legitimacy here, let alone the judicial framework. The UN has many, many specialised agencies with legitimacy, jurisdiction, an

> Definitely not, the UN has no legitimacy here, let alone the judicial framework. The UN has many, many specialised agencies with legitimacy, jurisdiction, and judicial frameworks: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_specialized_agencies_of_the_United_Nations https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_specialized_agencies_o... I think we’ll see one for media networks

jariel 6y ago
They have no legitimacy in this case, and just because an agency exists, doesn't really give it legitimacy either. The UN is a grab bag of patchwork things, some for the better, some for the worse. This is the last thing we want the UN involved in. If there were people truly suffering from this, then they'd be a great place to have an agency to give voice to the issue, but beyond that, no.
- webmaven 6y ago
  > They have no legitimacy in this case, and just because an agency exists, doesn't really give it legitimacy either. What does legitimacy mean to you in this context? I don't disagree that mere existence doesn't grant it, but I'm not sure I understand what (or who) would, in your view.