3 ms·
Not op, but it's pretty well researched. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_involvement_in_regime_change_in_Latin_America https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki
by eganist 6y ago
Not op, but it's pretty well researched. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_involvement_in_regime_change_in_Latin_America https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_involvement_in_r...
- psaux 6y agoInteresting it lists right wing and left wing focus. Sounds like the US is bias towards the middle. Not sure how to groc that. Most likely it is what is important to the nation at the time would be a better qualification. History repeats itself. Thank you for sharing the links all.
- arcticbull 6y agoThe US bias when, uh, intervening in foreign politics is towards whatever's best of the US. Usually, more specifically, US corporate interests. Little care is paid to who ends up in charge so long as they're pro-"Business" and pro-America.
- psaux 6y agoLooping back. That was I said or at least was trying to convey. It is what the the nation, US in this case, finds in their best interest.
- arcticbull 6y agoAh gotcha! :) sounds like we're in violent agreement.