Actually it's a good first step. Basically, FB is punting the responsibility of making the tough-call ban decisions to a 'neutral entity' - which is actually a

Actually it's a good first step. Basically, FB is punting the responsibility of making the tough-call ban decisions to a 'neutral entity' - which is actually a very good idea. Bad on the whole, because FB ultimately I don't think should be entirely responsible for the decision (we need some helpful regulation maybe?). But nevertheless, it's a decent idea because it does add some legitimacy to the decisions. Zuck would probably like nothing other than to wash his hands of the publicity of decisions making, that said, I'm doubtful of the neutrality of the board either politically or from FB itself. The board - whoever they are - knows that Zuck is the Man, and that's that.