4 ms·
There's probably little need for the overhead associated with other filesystems (security, multi-user support, crash recovery, etc.). Personally I would have p
by jasongullickson 15y ago
There's probably little need for the overhead associated with other filesystems (security, multi-user support, crash recovery, etc.).
Personally I would have preferred a custom filesystem designed for the application but I can see the convenience of being FAT-compatible. I wouldn't expect these nodes to keep much data locally (if any).