>Anonymity seems to just bring the worst out of people (that's not a tech problem, that's a human/culture problem). I would personally love to see a "web" where

>Anonymity seems to just bring the worst out of people (that's not a tech problem, that's a human/culture problem). I would personally love to see a "web" where you have to comment...as your public self. Post messages...as your public self (not just on an individual platform level). So on and so forth. I'm going to guess you're liberal and think the 'storming' of the capital was the political event of the decade on par with 9/11. Yet it was all organized in the open on facebook using real names. Curious how using real names did not stop anyone. People are willing to do things they believe in that are detrimental to themselves. That is after all why the US exists. Anonymity is a way for people to say that they want to blow up parliament and get feedback on why it's a good or bad idea before doing it. It is very confusing to me why the US, a country that hasn't had a real genocide since the 1860s, is taking advice on speech regulation from countries whose last genocide was in the 1940s.