3 ms·
Two things: 1. That movies are being projected at considerably less than their intended brightness seems like an empirical fact to me. Unless you really believ
by joshmaker 15y ago
Two things:
1. That movies are being projected at considerably less than their intended brightness seems like an empirical fact to me. Unless you really believe that watching a movie through a pair of sunglasses (the equivalent to projecting it through polarized lenses) might improve the experience I'm not sure what more evidence you need. The pragmatic basis for his outrage is the fact that movies are often projected with much less light than their creators intended.
2. Calling someone "well read" is the same as calling them knowledgeable or well informed. While I believe Ebert to be well read on this particular issue, I believe from the context of your post that you meant to write "widely read" (or else I misinterpreted your argument).
- grovulent 15y agoOn your second point - yes, careless word usage on my point. On your first point see my reply above.