> I have a hard time following the idea that google should use its dominant market position to force others into submission If it's just a case of legally avoi

> I have a hard time following the idea that google should use its dominant market position to force others into submission If it's just a case of legally avoiding the new law, it's not a case of using "its dominant position to force others into submission." If they remove the smallest level of what makes them noncompliant, which in this case might be removing search outright (because otherwise they are supposed to link to and pay the news sites), to me that's fair game and not monopolistic. If they threaten to do something to unrelated things like Gmail or GCP, that's not OK.