11 ms·
> of course there's 99% trash I'm offended. 99% of the number of desktop environments, or the installation, or the stylized installations? As with everything
by MayeulC 6y ago
> of course there's 99% trash
I'm offended. 99% of the number of desktop environments, or the installation, or the stylized installations?
As with everything artistic, the last is a matter of taste, and the more opinionated a visual design is, the more you are likely to disagree with it.
For the rest, please give names.. I've seen magnificients {i3, sway, KDE, GNOME, XFCE, cinnamon, etc}. ricing is a popular sport.
- flohofwoe 6y agoWhen you look through the themes on sites like https://www.gnome-look.org/browse/cat/135/ord/rating/ https://www.gnome-look.org/browse/cat/135/ord/rating/, sort by rating and then skip the first few result pages, most of those themes don't look that "great". I don't understand how that's offending though, it's a normal quality distribution (also see https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sturgeon%27s_law https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sturgeon%27s_law)
- MayeulC 6y ago> the most slick and stylish desktops are now on Linux (of course there's 99% trash I read that as 99% of the Linux desktops being trash. There are a number of desktop environments, but calling any of these "trash" is pretty harsh and subjective, even for something as barebones as weston. For theme, icon, color packs, etc, for any desktop environment, I agree. That's always been the case for most user-generated content anyway. But you do see a lot of subjectively great styles on reddit.com/r/unixporn, even for environments such as windowmaker or fluxbox!