> The entire Haskell standard library could be rewritten, more or less, in Scala. How is that "kinda" functional? Surely all that means is that Scala is Turing

> The entire Haskell standard library could be rewritten, more or less, in Scala. How is that "kinda" functional? Surely all that means is that Scala is Turing Complete, not that it is purely functional. Also, you use the "more-or-less" qualifier whilst disagreeing with the "kinda" qualifier, even though they are "pretty much" synonymous.