> Also all text-based, non-graphical interface. I would consider this a positive. Graphics do not imply improved readability, the information is dense and you

> Also all text-based, non-graphical interface. I would consider this a positive. Graphics do not imply improved readability, the information is dense and you have no choice but to present it as concisely as possible. You also need a dim cockpit for low light operations. What could be a win is integration with the QRG to make access to information easier during a abnormal operating condition. You spend precious seconds locating and flipping through paper books to identify mitigation procedures.