4 ms·
> help protect against AWS nonsense Not gaslighting, legit questions follow: It's not clear to me how taking open source software and providing commercial man
by popcorncowboy 6y ago
> help protect against AWS nonsense
Not gaslighting, legit questions follow:
It's not clear to me how taking open source software and providing commercial managed services is "nonsense"? Or is it specifically when AWS does it that it's not okay?
Either way, is there something specific at play that makes it fundamentally different from say WPEngine running hosted Wordpress? Is it purely a function of scale?
If a startup decides that Kubernetes is worth providing a managed service for at what point does providing that managed service become "AWS nonsense"? Is there a revenue watermark beyond which what they're doing becomes unfair? Or is k8s ok because it's backed by a mega-corp already?
- virtue3 6y agoAWS repeatedly said they were "together with elastic" in service offerings. They apparently were not, so they were just running on elastics coat tails, offering nothing to elastic, and saying they were totally together. It's hilarious that you picked K8. K8 destroyed dockers ability to make money. They were planning on rolling out their own system, but didn't get it out fast enough and got eaten. Was k8 nonsense? no, they made a product from the ground up.