> The police literally stood aside for the MAGA seditionists, but opened fire on peaceful BLM protestors due to the threat of a pink umbrella. Yes, this is very

> The police literally stood aside for the MAGA seditionists, but opened fire on peaceful BLM protestors due to the threat of a pink umbrella. Yes, this is very true, but likely not in the way you mean to suggest. That seems to be exactly what I meant to suggest with it. Whom do you think the police agrees with? Suddenly violence is given more leeway by it. > And racist speech is protected and has been protected by the American Supreme Court on multiple occasions (National Socialist Party of America v. Village of Skokie). Racist violence is not protected and nor is BLM violence. Speech is simply earlier ruled “violence” by the courts whenever it be speech the court doesn't agree with.