3 ms·
They already do effectively subsidise them (by not enforcing taxes properly) > 2013 News Corp had just won a court case against the Australian Tax Office (ATO)
by dbetteridge 6y ago
They already do effectively subsidise them (by not enforcing taxes properly)
> 2013 News Corp had just won a court case against the Australian Tax Office (ATO) in the Federal Court and was duly awarded a tax refund of $882 million. At the Tax Office, they were not happy. Some badly wanted to appeal the decision. After all, News was then the ATO’s “number one corporate tax risk”, the nation’s premier tax dodger that is.
> Insiders say the prospects of the Tax Office winning on appeal were good but the case was never re-contested. Taxpayers picked up the bill for what was a non-cash, paper transaction where News Corp’s Australian operations recorded a $2 billion loss and its tax haven entities a $2 billion gain.
Their tax from the last 5 years was less than $10M, while they got government subsidies of $40M. So not only are they paying no tax, the taxpayers are paying THEM. An American company, btw.
https://iknow.cch.com.au/document/atagUio1574205sl227210907/news-australia-holdings-pty-ltd-v-fc-of-t https://iknow.cch.com.au/document/atagUio1574205sl227210907/...
(Court case with the Newscorp)