3 ms·
> Ignoring the very next paragraph that says AWS can terminate with no notice. Their own response to that point in the reply brief was pitiful. This is the par
by alexeldeib 6y ago
> Ignoring the very next paragraph that says AWS can terminate with no notice. Their own response to that point in the reply brief was pitiful.
This is the part I don't understand. Did they really think no one would notice it?
- jcranmer 6y agoMy working theory is that they didn't notice it until AWS pointed it out in the reply brief. Their previous attorney apparently dropped them as a client sometime around the 8th, and I suspect this lawsuit was put together in extreme rush on the 10th to keep Parler running. It absolutely wouldn't surprise me if neither Parler nor the attorney actually reviewed the agreement in enough detail to notice that AWS had the right to terminate immediately. Admittedly, this theory doesn't explain how the antitrust count gets added.
- deleted 6y ago[deleted]