3 ms·
It wasn't a suggestion of replacement, it was saying that even the closest instance still doesn't get you 24TB of on-host storage, having to use EBS instead.
by dastbe 6y ago
It wasn't a suggestion of replacement, it was saying that even the closest instance still doesn't get you 24TB of on-host storage, having to use EBS instead.
- PeterCorless 6y agoThis starts going down a rabbit hole of tiered storage then. Because unless you design for that, you can only be as fast as your slowest storage. It'd be like tying a 20 kg weight to the leg of a sprinter otherwise.