3 ms·
The sarcastic reply comment was downvoted for a reason, but I will point out the HN guidelines do specifically request you don’t imply someone hasn’t read the a
by whiddershins 6y ago
The sarcastic reply comment was downvoted for a reason, but I will point out the HN guidelines do specifically request you don’t imply someone hasn’t read the article.
The fact that this thread went downhill immediately does indicate this might be a really good guideline.
- emtel 6y agoBut I didn't imply anything, I asked if he had read it. I wasn't trying to be rude, I legitimately think that the rest of that paragraph was a really good answer to his question.
- plinkplonk 6y ago(fwiw) you could have left the question out and your second sentence would have conveyed your intent perfectly.
- whiddershins 6y agoI know you didn’t mean it that way. It’s why the guideline is so brilliant, imho. It is showing us something that isn’t obvious. You are being well meaning, but there’s something about the question ‘did you read ...’ that gets people going when they are maybe on the fence about how combative they want to be.