4 ms·
To compare the two is to ignore so much context I can't imagine you're being anything other than disingenuous.
by iamdbtoo 6y ago
To compare the two is to ignore so much context I can't imagine you're being anything other than disingenuous.
- throwaway45349 6y agoWhy? Both are a disenfranchised voice complaining with violence. One might be more valid than the other, but that doesn't mean one is inherently better.
- iamdbtoo 6y agoNo, they are not. Not at all and that you think that is exactly my point. One is the voice of a group that has been in power throughout the history of this country and the other is a group that has been oppressed by the former group. One group is using violence to maintain their power, while the other is using anything they can to make their lives better.