4 ms·

The community did that in good faith. What's the incentive for the community to contribute to the project if Vendor XYZ is going to offer the same project with

• bigiain 6y ago
  The buggy whip community invested in buggy whip manufacturing too. Sometimes step changes happen, and things are just different afterwards. I see two related "changes in the world" here that are contributing to this current drama.'' 1) the rise of SaaS and globally centralised cloud hosting. 2) the emergence of companies solely (or mostly) built on paying salaries to developers writing an open source software project. (Elastic/Mongo/Redis being the primary examples). As I see it, the 30 year old "Open Source" principles didn't see these coming any more than the buggy whip industry saw the Model T coming. Personally, I'd really like to see those three companies (and others/new entrants) come up with a workable new model for software licenses for some kind of "freely usable software" ("free" in the generic "no obligations" sense, not the GPL/Stallman "freedom" sense) written by salaried devs at for-profit companies. I think the world would be a better place with more software closer to the Stallman end of the license spectrum than the Oracle end. I don't think that's necessarily a given. It might well be true that in general, a for profit company cannot make enough money out of writing software and giving it away to keep teams of full time developers paid.
  • CRConrad 6y ago
    ~20, not 30.