4 ms·

What do you mean by saying that democrats took over the post office? I assume you mean the USPS? The postmaster general was appointed by Trump. The senate until

What do you mean by saying that democrats took over the post office? I assume you mean the USPS? The postmaster general was appointed by Trump. The senate until just last week had a Republican majority. Exactly how did the Democrats exercise power to "take over"?

fjabre 6y ago
Dems pushed the use of the USPS as a general voting system. Terrible idea. The USPS was not designed this way. Dems knew they could leverage their population dense cities to win this using USPS. To say that one side is clean and the other is corrupt is clearly incorrect. They both cheat. They both cheat a lot. The dems just cheated better this time.
- PaulDavisThe1st 6y ago
  You have no evidence of cheating in this election that has been accepted by any court. You have no evidence that USPS function "favored" Democrats. You are perpetuating the lies that have been told by the former president and his supporters for the last 2+ months.
  - fjabre 6y ago
    You're right. The dems would never cheat. Don't care that they did. They just cheated better this time.
- DFHippie 6y ago
  The Democrats wanted the USPS to deliver the mail. They also wanted people to be able to vote through the mail because we are in the middle of the worst pandemic in 100 years. This is different from treating the USPS as a general voting system. You are arguing that the Democrats cheated more than the Republicans, or "better". Do you have any evidence of this? This needs to be evidence from the past election, not Chicago in 1962 or something.
  - fjabre 6y ago
    They cheated. And in several elections. Hats off. I know they did because the motive was there and the cost too great. I have faith in all men to make the same decisions when the time comes. Clearly there was cheating on both sides.
    - amanaplanacanal 6y ago
      Does “clearly” mean you have evidence? It sounds like your argument is that everyone will cheat if they have the chance.
      - fjabre 6y ago
        Most people will cheat in high stakes games. That's why I give it a high probability in a high stakes game like the last election. I know everyone wants hard evidence but I'm establishing motives. I cannot possibly prove any of this to you. Certainly not enough of anything to convict anyone just to point out that the likelihood of cheating on both sides was very high in the last election.
        triceratops 6y ago
        > Most people will cheat in high stakes games. Citation required. > I cannot possibly prove any of this to you. So why bother saying it?

fjabre 6y ago

Dems pushed the use of the USPS as a general voting system. Terrible idea. The USPS was not designed this way. Dems knew they could leverage their population dense cities to win this using USPS. To say that one side is clean and the other is corrupt is clearly incorrect. They both cheat. They both cheat a lot. The dems just cheated better this time.

PaulDavisThe1st 6y ago
You have no evidence of cheating in this election that has been accepted by any court. You have no evidence that USPS function "favored" Democrats. You are perpetuating the lies that have been told by the former president and his supporters for the last 2+ months.
- fjabre 6y ago
  You're right. The dems would never cheat. Don't care that they did. They just cheated better this time.
DFHippie 6y ago
The Democrats wanted the USPS to deliver the mail. They also wanted people to be able to vote through the mail because we are in the middle of the worst pandemic in 100 years. This is different from treating the USPS as a general voting system. You are arguing that the Democrats cheated more than the Republicans, or "better". Do you have any evidence of this? This needs to be evidence from the past election, not Chicago in 1962 or something.
- fjabre 6y ago
  They cheated. And in several elections. Hats off. I know they did because the motive was there and the cost too great. I have faith in all men to make the same decisions when the time comes. Clearly there was cheating on both sides.
  - amanaplanacanal 6y ago
    Does “clearly” mean you have evidence? It sounds like your argument is that everyone will cheat if they have the chance.
    - fjabre 6y ago
      Most people will cheat in high stakes games. That's why I give it a high probability in a high stakes game like the last election. I know everyone wants hard evidence but I'm establishing motives. I cannot possibly prove any of this to you. Certainly not enough of anything to convict anyone just to point out that the likelihood of cheating on both sides was very high in the last election.
      - triceratops 6y ago
        > Most people will cheat in high stakes games. Citation required. > I cannot possibly prove any of this to you. So why bother saying it?