3 ms·
I think they probably know they have no case but are trying to fan the flames of the culture war to generate support and keep their name in the media until they
by boringg 6y ago
I think they probably know they have no case but are trying to fan the flames of the culture war to generate support and keep their name in the media until they find other hosting services.
- SantalBlush 6y agoThis seems likely. They bring a weak case, and when it gets thrown out, they can say that further proves their victimhood.
- trident5000 6y agoVictimhood, the new oil of the 21st century.
- boringg 6y agoThe lifeblood of the GOP
- trident5000 6y agoGoes even further than that.
- boringg 6y agoTrue
- curryst 6y ago> keep their name in the media until they find other hosting services. This is the winner right here. It's a rather brilliant play, it keeps reminding their users that they exist. If they can find new hosting before they run out of ways to get in the headlines, they stand a good chance of keeping many of their users. I would expect to see another wild filing after discovery. They'll find a quote from low-level employees from Amazon and Twitter talking to each other, inflate their credentials so they seem like they have authority, and then make a Sherman Act claim out of it. I'm curious what lawyer would be willing to file these. The judge even takes the time to point out the places where Parler undermines their own case. This seems like it's just sacrificing your legal career; who would hire you after showing up in court and arguing this with a straight face?