3 ms·
> Now Chrome has removed FTP support completely. You can just as effectively have HTTP sites that are simple listings of available software. I don't think FTP
by kevincox 6y ago
> Now Chrome has removed FTP support completely.
You can just as effectively have HTTP sites that are simple listings of available software. I don't think FTP removal is really relevant here except for nostalgia.
- sub7 6y agoDisagree. FTP as a protocol made self hosting all kinds of things much easier. We could soon live in a world where people self host their own data powered by protocols that will borrow heavily from FTP.
- spijdar 6y agoDid it? I've always had more trouble throwing up quick FTP servers vs a quick "python3 -m http.server" for a throwaway HTTP server.
- core-questions 6y agoGemini says hello!
- sub7 6y agoHello! If only protocols weren't treated as cash cows
- PurpleFoxy 6y agoHardly. You can install Apache and drop your files in it and the default settings make it look pretty much like an FTP listing.
- technofiend 6y agoFTP has some interesting features not found in straight HTTP such as charset conversion and my favorite the HOST command. HOST was the escape valve for commands you needed run that weren't implemented in the FTP protocol itself. I'm sure it's a terrible vulnerability now but it was fun to use and see what you could make a remote machine do.
- Spivak 6y agoHTTP is one layer too low to replace FTP. HTTP can provide the transport but not the application semantics. We would have to agree on a protocol that uses HTTP to replace FTP.
- kevincox 6y agoThat is a fair point. WebDAV seems to provide the listing and update semantics that you are looking for. WebDAV is widely supported by webservers so I think it is a great replacement for FTP.