4 ms·
Huh? You can't claim authorship of anonymous publication. Neither the author, nor anybody else, it's the whole point, anonymous once anonymous forever.
by GoblinSlayer 6y ago
Huh? You can't claim authorship of anonymous publication. Neither the author, nor anybody else, it's the whole point, anonymous once anonymous forever.
- bidirectional 6y agoThere are multiple ways one could prove themselves to be Satoshi. He has known public keys, bitcoin wallets, email accounts etc.
- aeturnum 6y agoAs they point out, the paper is not anonymous. It is pseudonymous. "Satoshi" is a person or persons whose communications are validated through a public key (Qanon folks take note). Anyone claiming to be Satoshi can simply sign something with the associated private key and prove they were involved with the identity.
- GoblinSlayer 6y agoWhat is the reason to believe that the key belongs to Satoshi? Did he post a proof?
- FabHK 6y agoThat is not only false in this case, but also in general. As another refutation, consider A Warning, by Anonymous, subsequently revealed to be Department of Homeland Security official Miles Taylor.
- GoblinSlayer 6y agoYou can personally believe such revelations, but they aren't binding.