5 ms·

There's more than one explanation as to why "mainstream media" might not run a story. The NY Post isn't exactly known as a bastion of credible journalism. That

There's more than one explanation as to why "mainstream media" might not run a story. The NY Post isn't exactly known as a bastion of credible journalism. That's why they ran the Hunter Biden laptop story when everyone else passed because they couldn't verify it.

aerosmile 6y ago
I agree with the overall sentiment of your post, but using the Hunter Biden laptop story as an example is an unfortunate choice. There's a popular view that politics had a lot to do with who picked up the story and who didn't, as opposed to just the strength of the case itself. I would recommend picking a less controversial example that highlights the shortcomings of NY Post's journalism, such as their reporting on the Boston Bombers [1]. [1] https://archives.cjr.org/the_audit/the_new_york_posts_disgrace.php https://archives.cjr.org/the_audit/the_new_york_posts_disgra...
- Bud 6y ago
  Ahem. You mean alleged (by Rudy Giuliani, the least credible source in the continental United States) "Hunter Biden" laptop.
- Applejinx 6y ago
  Or, it could be a garbage story manufactured by liars, implying that of all the outlets not running it, there's a chance they had looked into it and decided it was a garbage story manufactured by liars. Sometimes a thing that fails, fails because it's bad or disingenuous or both. It's possible this is a garbage suit that won't go anywhere because it's a garbage suit.
- isochronous 6y ago
  Yeah, there are a lot of "popular views" that are complete and utter nonsense
briandear 6y ago
Couldn’t verify? Or refused to try?
- Bud 6y ago
  Tried, hard, and found that it was not substantive.
fakedang 6y ago
I know that it's the Post. My point is that if the Post was able to cover it, why couldn't a bigger outlet such as NYT or the BBC spare the resources to cover it too. Not to mention, the Hunter Biden story was mostly speculative without proof. This one is a federal case with all details out in the open.

aerosmile 6y ago

I agree with the overall sentiment of your post, but using the Hunter Biden laptop story as an example is an unfortunate choice. There's a popular view that politics had a lot to do with who picked up the story and who didn't, as opposed to just the strength of the case itself. I would recommend picking a less controversial example that highlights the shortcomings of NY Post's journalism, such as their reporting on the Boston Bombers [1]. [1] https://archives.cjr.org/the_audit/the_new_york_posts_disgrace.php https://archives.cjr.org/the_audit/the_new_york_posts_disgra...

Bud 6y ago
Ahem. You mean alleged (by Rudy Giuliani, the least credible source in the continental United States) "Hunter Biden" laptop.
Applejinx 6y ago
Or, it could be a garbage story manufactured by liars, implying that of all the outlets not running it, there's a chance they had looked into it and decided it was a garbage story manufactured by liars. Sometimes a thing that fails, fails because it's bad or disingenuous or both. It's possible this is a garbage suit that won't go anywhere because it's a garbage suit.
isochronous 6y ago
Yeah, there are a lot of "popular views" that are complete and utter nonsense

briandear 6y ago

Couldn’t verify? Or refused to try?

Bud 6y ago
Tried, hard, and found that it was not substantive.

fakedang 6y ago

I know that it's the Post. My point is that if the Post was able to cover it, why couldn't a bigger outlet such as NYT or the BBC spare the resources to cover it too. Not to mention, the Hunter Biden story was mostly speculative without proof. This one is a federal case with all details out in the open.