5 ms·
There’s a simple way to verify his claim, yet he has yet to do so. Why, if he could, would he not? And why would the opinion of a single person (Gavin, or anyo
by chabes 6y ago
There’s a simple way to verify his claim, yet he has yet to do so. Why, if he could, would he not?
And why would the opinion of a single person (Gavin, or anyone) be relevant to wether or not Craig’s claim is factual?
- jonathanaird 6y agoHe’s stated his reasoning many, many times. Legally speaking, keys do not prove identity. They prove access to keys which can be stolen. He’s making an intentional point to prove it in a court of law as a part of his bigger point that Bitcoin exists within existing legal frameworks and was not created to evade the law. Quite the opposite, it was created as a system to provide immutable evidentiary trails.
- smitj 6y agoCraig worded this nicely 2 weeks ago here https://youtu.be/_E7iuVM4CIA?t=2133 https://youtu.be/_E7iuVM4CIA?t=2133