> which is simply not true None of us know what was available back then but you are right, maybe there was an option to work with someone and maybe even with r

> which is simply not true None of us know what was available back then but you are right, maybe there was an option to work with someone and maybe even with results in a similar time frame. But considering the greater risk I don't think there is certainty how a collaboration with an external partner on a new technology would have ended. I am also not convinced we need RISC-V to move education forward meaningfully and I think what they've got here will do the job. Hopefully people will be able to buy something similar based on RISC-V for <£5 soon and that'll kick-start even more options in this space. But we don't seem to be there quite yet.