> Still think generics are static typists admitting the shortcomings of a type system, without actually doing so, though. Wait, what? Any static type person wi

> Still think generics are static typists admitting the shortcomings of a type system, without actually doing so, though. Wait, what? Any static type person will readily say that type systems have shortcomings (though I'd probably prefer limits or limitations as a word with fewer negative connotations). It's just a matter of which limitations.