4 ms·
I spent two and a half years on one. No it is not.
by cbozeman 6y ago
I spent two and a half years on one.
No it is not.
- dylan604 6y agoJust because you're over being in a submerged tube doesn't mean other people can't find it fascinating. I find the silent service totally fascinating, and would happily buy you beers to hear stories you are not allowed to tell.
- cbozeman 6y agoWell how about I tell you the stories I can tell, for free? I have to go get a car battery replaced, but when I come back, I'll share a few tales. Sometimes, I would stare into the Reactor Compartment through the glass (there's a large-ish - around 6" - 8" if I recall correctly) porthole that allows you to look right into the reactor compartment at the nuclear reactor. I never stared for long... maybe 5-10 seconds at most, but staring at nuclear fission occurring is truly an awesome experience. There's no Cherenkov radiation emitted, so you're just staring through glass at a bunch of metal, but you still know its occurring... and that was enough for me.
- GuB-42 6y agoI think it is like a lot of unusual things. Looks fascinating from the outside, but it gets really boring really quick. Everything military is a good example. Who doesn't like the idea of working on secret, state of the art technology? Truth is, the secret part mostly gets in the way, because of the "right to know", you don't really know what you are working on, and you may not even have internet access on your computer. As for the "state of the art", it tends to be pretty underwhelming. Besides military-specific constraints like stealth, it tends to lag behind civilian technology, probably related to the already mentioned secrecy that gets in the way. Same thing happen when you get to work with really expensive equipment. Sounds great because who doesn't want a machine almost no one can afford? In reality, you are unlikely to get to play with it. Because it is an expensive machine, your company is going to make sure it is used to make money and not just for your own curiosity. Personal use is likely to get you fired.
- dctoedt 6y ago> I spent two and a half years on [a submarine]. Hah! I spent a week aboard a fast attack, on TAD just before nuclear power school; the experience gradually convinced me that I should be a surface nuke. (My tuber buddies at nuke school joked that by making the switch, I raised the average IQ in both communities.)
- cbozeman 6y agoThat sounds like a submariner's joke alright. I used to hear that "Navy nuclear submarine personnel are the top 10% of the Navy!" They would repeat that shit over and over to us at Sub School. After a year onboard the USS Honolulu, I remember thinking, "If this is the top 10%, I'd fuckin' hate to see the bottom 90..." I did end up spending some time with the bottom 90%, briefly. After the Hono, I was transferred to Patrol Coastal Crew Charlie. At the time we were still attached to SOCOM, so it was a really great, if hard, life. The last 6 months or so of my time in the Navy, we got folded into "Big Navy". Not fun. At the time, each crew simply flew to an available PC boat, usually to relieve another crew, as 3 PC crews generally operated out of Bahrain and Kuwait at any given time. It was cheaper to ferry most of the PC boats over by large ship instead of trying to sail them, as you generally need to refuel a PC boat every 7 days, give or take. Having to actually do maintenance on our equipment instead of spending hours every week at the range shooting and hours at sea practicing on the twin-50s and the 25mm autocannon was a real drag. I'm glad I got out when I did. It was all of the fun with none of the work, and then become all of the work and 5% of the fun.