3 ms·
It's a violation of bodily sovereignty in ways those others arent. We regard our bodies as our own possessions, and something like a vaccination is a potential
by mjburgess 6y ago
It's a violation of bodily sovereignty in ways those others arent.
We regard our bodies as our own possessions, and something like a vaccination is a potentially irreversible change to our body (etc.).
This is not an argument to say bodily sovereignty shouldn't be "ignored" here, only that it is a different case.
EDIT: anyone want to explain the downvote?
- Broken_Hippo 6y agoExplain: Average anti-vax talking points. It is generally useless to argue against them, and rarely are such points used for, say, legalisation of weed or stopping employment drug tests. Not only that, but vaccinations affect more than just your body. Such a choice can kill someone else if they get a disease a non-vaccinated person carries.