4 ms·
> The thing about this "self-correction" is that nobody, but nobody has a mechanism to explain this force. Not how it works or worse yet, how it will know how t
by throwaway2245 6y ago
> The thing about this "self-correction" is that nobody, but nobody has a mechanism to explain this force. Not how it works or worse yet, how it will know how to self-correct.
You could think of it that the universe where we exist must have a stable/consistent state.
If we go back in time and change the state, then that universe can't (didn't) exist, so it can't be the universe that we are in. From our point of view in the present (before time-travelling), the state change was in the past, it will have already happened before we start time-travelling.
This doesn't technically preclude us from going back in time. It's more that the present state (at least as we observe it) is pre-determined, since we already exist in the present.
- ku-man 6y agoIf time travel was possible, this proposition is the most logical (you put it very well, by the way). But at the same time, it's almost useless for the time traveller. Imagine a man that suffered a terrible accident when we was 10 years old, and had a miserable life from that point on. When he is 60 time travel is possible, so he decides to travel 50 years back to prevent the accident. He succeeds, but this new timeline doesn't mean the previous timeline won't/didn't happen. This new him will have a better life but the other him will still be miserable.