2 ms·
I fail to see how this preserves some ability of Google to do whatever they like at the W3C. I see it as highlighting exactly why Google can't do whatever they
by tssva 6y ago
I fail to see how this preserves some ability of Google to do whatever they like at the W3C. I see it as highlighting exactly why Google can't do whatever they like at the W3C. Just as their single vote prevented this change any other single voting organization could block whatever Google wants to do at the W3C.
- int_19h 6y agoThe real problem is that Google, due to ownership of Blink/Chrome, has so much power de facto that the W3C process cannot meaningfully prevent them from doing whatever they like anyway - if W3C doesn't follow, it risks a repeat of WHATWG.
- tssva 6y agoI'm not sure why the W3C should have the power to prevent anybody from doing anything.