4 ms·
I have to say that there is a huge flaw in that article and thinking. Women in their 30s lose their looks really fast. (unless you have plastic surgery, botox
by ardit33 18y ago
I have to say that there is a huge flaw in that article and thinking.
Women in their 30s lose their looks really fast. (unless you have plastic surgery, botox, etc.), women just look better on their mid 20s.
These great "women", hold on for their perfect partner, but they don't realise that their value is diminishing in time, and in their 30s they are no near as valuable than in their 20s, hence they will Have to setle for somebody less, or stay single forever.
Sorry if the above paragraph comes out too callous, comparing women to something with an expiration like milk, but the truth is that looks matter, and that there is a real biological "expiration" date on women, if they want to be mothers. Guys just don't have this limitation.
- blurry 18y agoIf only it were true. Yes, biologically speaking, women have an "expiration" date. However, no less biologically speaking, men need women to mate with, and therein lies a problem. If you cannot find a woman to mate with, your ability to have children is zero, and seeing as young ladies do not go for older gentlemen unless said gentlemen are wealthy (a negligibly small percentage of the population) the end result for men and women is zero sum game. Sorry if the above paragraph comes out too callous, comparing men to walking wallets, but the truth is, money does matter, and in the end a man is only as good as his money, if he wants someone to marry him. Women just don't have this limitation. P.S. I hope it's clear that the last paragraph was a parody on the post above. Personally, I think reducing women to their looks and men to their wallets is ridiculous. I was just illustrating a point.