3 ms·
> Is the art more interesting to look about than to talk about? That is an interesting perspective. I have always judged art by its aesthetics and its ability
by cwmartin 6y ago
> Is the art more interesting to look about than to talk about?
That is an interesting perspective. I have always judged art by its aesthetics and its ability to elicit thought / conversation equally.
In my view art becomes shallow when it is purely visually appealing with no conceptual backing or purely conceptual with uninteresting visual components.
- esyir 6y agoI'll put it the other way though, if you attribute it to any other artist, would the appeal be greatly reduced? Can the art stand alone and be great on its own merit rather than the borrowed fame of its creator?