5 ms·
Your point about executive orders is not quite correct. https://lawshelf.com/shortvideoscontentview/the-power-of-the-president-the-roles-of-executive-orders-in
by eevilspock 6y ago
Your point about executive orders is not quite correct.
https://lawshelf.com/shortvideoscontentview/the-power-of-the-president-the-roles-of-executive-orders-in-american-government/ https://lawshelf.com/shortvideoscontentview/the-power-of-the...
- philwelch 6y agoWikipedia notes: > The United States Constitution does not have a provision that explicitly permits the use of executive orders. Article II, Section 1, Clause 1 of the Constitution simply states: "The executive Power shall be vested in a President of the United States of America." Sections 2 and 3 describe the various powers and duties of the president, including "he shall take Care that the Laws be faithfully executed" They're constitutional--in the sense that the President has the legal authority to issue orders to the rest of the executive branch--but they are certainly not an explicit provision of the Constitution explicitly modeled after the royal decrees of the British monarchy.