> If [criteria], then mass pardoning is an act of justice and not someone becoming the arbiter of law. I dont understand your comment. Are you thinking that ac

> If [criteria], then mass pardoning is an act of justice and not someone becoming the arbiter of law. I dont understand your comment. Are you thinking that acts of justice, by definition, cannot also be the product of a person becoming an arbiter of law? That you perceive a decision as just doesn't change whether a person might or might not be acting as an arbiter of law.