4 ms·
> That's not foul play Maybe not legally, but if their (partial) intention is to retard AMD's design success, it's at least what is considered "a dick move".
by monopoledance 6y ago
> That's not foul play
Maybe not legally, but if their (partial) intention is to retard AMD's design success, it's at least what is considered "a dick move".
Intel is strong-arming AMD on many fronts AFAIK, I sincerely hope they vanish into insignificance for their dick-locomotion nature. And I also hope the EU succeeds at spinning up their own fabs. And that ancaps one day see the light of regulation.
I want fancy tech and scifi and wealth for everyone, and the free-market doesn't deliver. It's all monopolies and patent wars...
- jjoonathan 6y agoIntel (and NVidia for that matter) don't owe AMD uncontested access to TSMC's kingmaking process, no matter how much AMD fanboys wish it were so. > AMD's design success The market is showing us that the value center isn't design, it's fab. Which AMD gave up on. The lack of competition that's squeezing them is the very pile of dung they created by dropping their foundries.
- monopoledance 6y agoYes, I am not arguing the market logic. I am arguing against the market logic.