4 ms·
Yeah, that matches up with what I've seen. They've at least been decent enough not to kick people off the store, but I don't think it's possible to just have th
by AlphaWeaver 6y ago
Yeah, that matches up with what I've seen. They've at least been decent enough not to kick people off the store, but I don't think it's possible to just have them sign / publish something unlisted these days without a good deal of policy writing and justifications.
Yet the large actors still publish malicious updates to extensions. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
- tyingq 6y agoThey have this "private" feature now where you have to list the email addresses of people that are allowed to use the extension. I don't see why that couldn't be coupled with "no review required", so long as the list is relatively short. But, yeah, likely will never happen. Fortunately for me, I can re-do my extension to use the JS postMessage api which won't require hardly any permissions, and thus, not much to review.