3 ms·
I think it was more intended as a check for "justice". Where someone could technically be guilty of a crime, but the conviction was considered unjust. You would
by mbreese 6y ago
I think it was more intended as a check for "justice". Where someone could technically be guilty of a crime, but the conviction was considered unjust. You wouldn't necessarily want to repeal the law, but instead use the pardon to fix "edge cases".