2 ms·
So if I take someone's photograph and use ImageMagick to convert it to black and white, by your rationale it would not be covered by the copyright on the origin
by lutorm 15y ago
So if I take someone's photograph and use ImageMagick to convert it to black and white, by your rationale it would not be covered by the copyright on the original photo? Like someone said, it is a derivative work.
The copyright act says:
A “derivative work” is a work based upon one or more pre-existing works, such as a translation, musical arrangement, dramatization, fictionalization, motion picture version, sound recording, art reproduction, abridgment, condensation, or any other form in which a work may be recast, transformed, or adapted. A work consisting of editorial revisions, annotations, elaborations, or other modifications which, as a whole, represent an original work of authorship, is a “derivative work”.
- seanalltogether 15y agoProving that something is a derivative work is not so cut and dry, and in your case a lawyer may not be able to successfully argue that a black and white filter represents a derivative work. Even the Barack Obama Hope poster was never successfully argued one way or another as to whether it was a derivative work, and the 2 sides settled out of court.