3 ms·
I’m not familiar with the details of the design flaw and whether or not Wayland fixes it, but those links don’t contradict this being an X-specific design flaw.
by chrismorgan 6y ago
I’m not familiar with the details of the design flaw and whether or not Wayland fixes it, but those links don’t contradict this being an X-specific design flaw. I get the impression that swaylock is a direct port of i3lock, and thus stands a fair chance of being written and architected in an X style, rather than taking advantage of any superior form that Wayland may support but X didn’t.
Expressed otherwise: just because someone’s written one piece of bad software for Wayland doesn’t mean Wayland doesn’t allow you to write good software. (Whereas I get the impression from what I’m reading that X makes it impossible to write a good screen locker, if by that you require that it be crash-proof and use the usual platform toolkit for the UI.)
(Remember in this that I’m saying I don’t know. I’d like to hear if Wayland does have a good answer to this, or from anyone with definite knowledge that it doesn’t.)
- waheoo 6y agoI think they're simply saying that lock screens are hard to get right and that shitting on x11 at every chance you get doesn't help anything.