5 ms·
Could you be more specific? What's lower quality?
by geokon 6y ago
Could you be more specific? What's lower quality?
- The_rationalist 6y agoNot lower quality per se but the feature set is order of magnitude smaller and thus is a missfeat for modern languages
- jlouis 6y agoIt's just a different abstraction level. Taking the argument to the extreme, assembly is a misfit.
- pawelmurias 6y agoX86 assembly/native code offers more features than wasm but is not portable or safe to execute. Webasm is less powerful then graalvm/truffle.